Integrating HD and SD video and audio
Feb 1, 2006 12:00 PM, By Jean-Claude Krelic
 Figure 1. Aspect ratio control with AFD in a hybrid family. Click here to see an enlarged diagram. |
A critical issue in the successful deployment of HD services is the management of content with different aspect ratios and effective audio processing. Naturally, the complexity of format issues is dependent on the scale of HD operations at a facility, but these signal-processing challenges are typically faced by all HD facilities.
Aspect ratio conversion
Broadcasters working with both HD and SD need to maintain separate HD and SD output paths, while also broadcasting the same content on both channels. While most new material will be acquired natively in HD, broadcasters will continue to receive some SD material in both 16:9 and 4:3 formats. You also need to still work with your 4:3 format-archived material. Efficiently handling all these different aspect ratios has become a major issue for many broadcasters.
 Figure 2. AFD for sequential up- and downconversion. Click here to see an enlarged diagram. |
To address this challenge, broadcasters use automation and traffic systems, which allow operators to specify the ARC format for each piece of content. This setting can be recalled by the output conversion card for the HD and SD signal paths.
While the automation system determines whether the ARC works for the station output, it doesn't apply to other parts of the facility, such as the studio, online editing suite and ingest area. What's more, the addition of all of this information to the automation system brings greater complexity to the playout process. And because it relies on multiple operators to enter the correct ARC information, it opens the door to errors and playout using the wrong ARC format.
Dealing with a mix of aspect ratios on a daily basis involves multiple challenges if the broadcast output is to be of the quality today's viewers expect. In the past, broadcasters would select one aspect ratio conversion (ARC) and use that format at all times. This practice often led to the postage-stamp look or other undesirable effects. To overcome this, broadcasters must use the appropriate ARC for the HD content in order to maintain the shape of an image and avoid cutting out key elements of the picture.
In HD and SD signals, the AFD information is inserted into the vertical ancillary data, and it identifies not only the raster (4:3 or 16:9), but also the video signal's ARC type, whether that be 16:9 full screen, 16:9 with black pillarbox, 4:3 full screen, 4:3 with letterbox, etc.
In SD, the user can also apply the modified SMPTE RP-186 standard to identify the ARC type of the material. Because this information becomes part of the video signal, it is maintained as material moves throughout the broadcast facility.
 Figure 3. AFD for downconversion. Click here to see an enlarged diagram. |
AFD information can be inserted by different devices, including the frame sync; incoming-feed cards; up-, down- and crossconverters; or simply by an AFD flag-inserter card. Every signal that comes into a station can be flagged, either automatically or manually. With up-, down- and crossconverters, the flag is inserted automatically during the conversion.
Once this identifying information is included in video content, it can be used by the conversion card to perform the appropriate ARC automatically. The broadcaster need only predetermine the look that is wanted for an up- or downconverted signal, and all converter cards using the AFD information will be able to apply the appropriate conversion without station automation or manual intervention. Another key advantage to this solution is that the up-, down- or crossconverter card will do the ARC change automatically on a frame-by-frame basis, thus ensuring frame-accurate performance.
To solve this issue, Miranda Technologies developed a new standard, “Image Formatting Information — Active Format Description (AFD), Bar Data, and Pan-Scan,” to identify the different source ARC types and automate all these conversions. This standard has been proposed to SMPTE and currently is undergoing evaluation. (See Figures 1, 2, and 3.)
| Want to use this article? Click here for options! |  |
