Reader Feedback

Dec 1, 2005 12:00 PM

             

Camera resolution




Dear editor:

For years, all camera manufacturers quoted horizontal lines of resolution in their specs. It was through this measurement that you had a ballpark idea of the resolution of a broadcast camera.

By reading the horizontal lines of resolution, you could tell if a camera had great resolution or not. The finer the lines and the closer the lines were together, the greater the resolution. When the lines became fuzzy or blurred together, that was the horizontal resolving limit of the camera.

Now none of the manufacturers list horizontal lines of resolution in their spec sheets. Therefore, an old guy like me can't tell which camera has the best resolution.

How do you discern the resolving power of new video cameras?
Jim mitchell

Response from Larry Thorpe, national marketing executive, Canon Broadcast & Communications Division:

The perceived picture sharpness performance of an HD lens-camera imaging system entails a complex assimilation of the total spatial resolution portrayed on the HD display. Television camera specifications do not do justice to the realities of their picture sharpness capabilities.

Historically, camera manufacturers quoted horizontal lines of resolution as the prime measurement of the performance of their cameras. These numbers referred to the limiting resolution or the horizontal resolving power of the lens-camera system. It was an attempt to simplify a complex performance assessment to a singular number. Regrettably, this became an industry yardstick — a competitive horsepower number (in that bigger was allegedly better).

This has always been a flawed approach to the assessment of a lens-camera's true performance with respect to picture sharpness. The horizontal limiting resolution specification has no bearing on what actually stimulates the television viewer.

Fortunately, today's camera spec sheets do quote an additional horizontal number — usually called modulation depth — in their spec sheets. This is a more important number than the limiting resolution specification. The significance of this percentage number is that it provides a spot reading of the modulation transfer function (MTF) of the HD lens-camera system at one specific spatial frequency.

MTF is a plot of the contrast behavior of image detail of increasing spatial frequency, and it directly relates to perceived picture sharpness. The shape of the plotted MTF curve across the frequency band of the system is what realistically describes the performance of a given lens-camera system (perceived picture sharpness being a function of the square of the area under that curve). The overall MTF information is the only true assessment of the practical resolution performance.

For a contemporary 1080-line HD camera, a typical spec might read: “Depth of modulation: 45 percent or more horizontally (at 800 TV lines at picture center, or 27.5MHz, with typical lens).” Given that the 30MHz bandwidth (defined by a prescribed digital filter) of the 1080-line HD standard is equivalent to 872 TVL/ph, the quoted specification is telling us that the MTF curve near the extremity of the system bandwidth (at a spatial frequency of 800 TVL/ph — equivalent to 27.5MHz in the electronic frequency domain) is reproducing 45 percent of the contrast at low frequencies. Thus, it is a useful indicator of how well the horizontal MTF is holding up across the useful HD band. But, it by no means tells the full story. In comparing lens-camera systems, there is no substitute for actually measuring the depth of modulation at 200, 400, 600 and 800 TVL/ph and evaluating the MTF profile.

In addition, the above specification is confined to the picture center because the camera manufacturer understandably does not wish to engage in specifying the resolution behavior of the associated HD lens. Unlike the camera, all HD lenses have a variable resolution from picture center to extremities, which is compounded by further alterations over the focal range, with object distance from the lens and with aperture setting. No lens manufacturer publishes such specifications. Given the expense of HD lenses, it is recommended that they be carefully evaluated at different settings of the zoom and the iris.

Curiously, no manufacturers presently specify the vertical resolution for their HDTV cameras, though they continue to quote a limiting vertical resolution number for their respective SDTV cameras.

Test Your Knowledge!

See the Freezeframe question of the month on page 8 and enter to win a Broadcast Engineering T-shirt.
Send answers to bdick@primediabusiness.com




Want to use this article?
Click here for options!
Get Copyright Clearance

Share this article

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Brad on Broadcast



Current Issue

A view from the top

January 2012

Some of broadcast's brightest reveal where the industry is headed.

Read More articles...


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

 


Submit your product for our NAB coverage.

Resources

Broadcast Engineering Newsletters Broadcast Engineering Essential Guides Broadcast Engineering White Papers Broadcast Engineering Videos Broadcast Engineering Podcasts Broadcast Engineering Industry Calendar

Industry Calendar

Broadcast Engineering Glossary of Terms

Glossary

Broadcast Engineering RSS feed

RSS

Interactive Media

Broadcast Engineering Webinars Broadcast Engineering Training Broadcast Engineering Blogs Broadcast Engineering Mobile Apps Broadcast Engineering on Facebook

Facebook

Broadcast Engineering JobZone

JobZone

Broadcast Engineering BE Roll

Blog

Featured Products

A Broadcaster's Guide To Camera & Lens Technology

A Broadcaster's Guide To Camera & Lens TechnologyThis eBook provides both new and veteran shooters an in-depth understanding of the technology that lies between the camera lens and the recording medium and how to maximize a camera's performance.

File Based Technology and Workflow

File Based Technology and WorkflowFile-based technologies have replaced video tape methods for a majority of production and broadcast operations. The worlds of AV and IT are coalescing to create new methods and workflows for media

Digital Television Fundamentals

Digital Television FundamentalsThis course, written by broadcast engineer Phil Cianci, provides a basic tutorial platform on the hows and whys of ATSC digital operation.

Video Compression, Editing and Displays

Video Compression, Editing and DisplaysVideo compression, editing and displays is an in-depth tutorial on MPEG compression technology, editing MPEG content and evaluating color video monitors written by long-time video expert, trainer and writer Steve Mullen, Ph. D.

 

 

Sound Off Podcasts

Erik Moreno, co-general manager of the Mobile Content Venture

MCV racks up successes on way to bright mobile DTV future

2012 will be the year of mobile DTV. That’s the view of Erik Moreno, who along with Salil Dalvi, senior VP for Mobile Platform Development at NBC Universal, is co-general manager of the Mobile Content Venture.

Danny Wilson

OTT year in review

Hear snippets of podcast interviews done throughout 2011 with Pat McDonough of The Nielsen Company, Glen Friedman of Ideas & Solutions!, Danny Wilson of Pixelmetrix and Greg Herman of Watch TV. Pictured is Danny Wilson, Pixelmetrix.

 

Broadcast Engineering Digital Reference Guide

Browse Back Issues

Back to Top