Samsung split on white spaces debate

Dec 6, 2007 3:07 PM

    
The pending reallocation of white spaces spectrum has sparked lively debate among broadcasters, manufacturers and the government.

The pending reallocation of white spaces spectrum has sparked lively debate among broadcasters, manufacturers and the government.

The white spaces frequency allocation issue continues to evolve. While the initial conflict in the FCC’s push to redefine the U.S. spectrum has been between legacy devices like wireless microphones and future technologies like mobile broadband Internet devices, the debate has evolved to embrace concerns about reception of DTV broadcast signals.

Recently, a member of the White Spaces Coalition (WSC), South Korean manufacturer Samsung Electronics, has become a case study in the complexities of the spectrum allocation issue. The consumer products giant became involved with the coalition as a natural beneficiary of the push for unlicensed devices in the contested spectrum, primarily for mobile Internet access. But ironically, another division of the company has expressed the same concern voiced by the NAB — that such unlicensed use has the potential to interfere with reception of DTV signals.

Both arms of the company are concerned with maximizing returns on their considerable investments and are now aware of the importance of both initiatives being realized without mutual interference. This puts Samsung in the position of both supporting unlicensed use of white spaces and of ensuring that existing users within that spectrum be protected from potential interference.

In the past month, two firms have become involved in the race to produce technology that will ensure proper operation of all devices. Motorola submitted a White Spaces Device (WSD) called the Cognitive Radio Device to the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology for testing. The Motorola device is designed to test for and avoid interference with DTV signals. Meanwhile, a small California company, Adaptrum, has committed to delivering its own devices, again designed to detect even weak DTV signals and avoid using those channels.

Previously, devices submitted by WSC members Philips and Microsoft met with mixed results in FCC testing. The agency is committed to continue testing, although it is unclear whether that commitment is to DTV reception along; legacy wireless systems used by virtually all broadcasters, churches and stage productions; or both.

For more information, visit www.fcc.gov.




Want to use this article?
Click here for options!
Get Copyright Clearance

Share this article

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Current Issue

Online captioning compliance

May 2012

The FCC has issued captioning requirements for all online video. Learn how to meet the requirements of the new rules and how to automate the technical process.

Read More articles...

Related Newsletter

Audio Technology Update
A twice-monthly newsletter about audio technology.

Related Posts


Confused about the terminology in an article? Find definitions of common terms and abbreviations in Broadcast Engineering's Glossary.

 


Video Compression, Editing and Displays

Video Compression, Editing and Displays

Video compression, editing and displays is an in-depth tutorial on MPEG compression technology, editing MPEG content and evaluating color video monitors written by long-time video expert, trainer and writer Steve Mullen, Ph. D.

File Based Technology and Workflow

File Based Technology and Workflow

File-based technologies have replaced video tape methods for a majority of production and broadcast operations. The worlds of AV and IT are coalescing to create new methods and workflows for media

Sound Off Podcasts

 

Broadcast Engineering Digital Reference Guide

Browse Back Issues

Back to Top