Automation-in-a-box

Jun 1, 2009 12:00 PM, By Stoyan Marinov

Beware of solutions that are backbones and don't add up to a fully functional system.

             
Figure 1. The traditional automation system is based on a controller, which triggers a number of attached devices including servers and branding keyers.

Figure 1. The traditional automation system is based on a controller, which triggers a number of attached devices including servers and branding keyers.
Select image to enlarge.

It's been obvious for a decade or so that there is a clear trend toward converging technologies despite the challenges convergence usually presents. One can see examples of convergence almost everywhere — mobile TV, Web TV, triple-play services (TV, Internet and phone) and TV games. The thing is, it's more convenient, more interesting, easier to install and cheaper than all of the components alone.

How would a newcomer to the broadcast automation industry gain significant market share? The answer is to introduce something really unique or create a new market niche. Automation-in-a-box providers have done both at the same time. They introduced an innovative all-in-one product that solved a number of issues, and its cost was just a fraction of a traditional automation system. (See Figure 1.) In half a decade, those newcomers achieved such success that they provoked traditional vendors to reconsider much of their development and marketing efforts.

Today, most automation vendors seem to offer all-in-one converging solutions — channel-in-a-box, TV-in-a-box, automation-in-a-box, you name it. As with other new market trends, a certain amount of caution must be exercised when selecting such a solution. Not all automation-in-a-box solutions are born equal; some are under-featured, others are just crippled versions of full automation systems, and some are far from a “boxed” concept.

It's the name that misleads. The box definition appears to be very flexible, such as a huge black box or an entire rack of equipment marketed as a single box. Beware: There are automation-in-a-box solutions that comprise all the traditional elements — controller, servers, router, inserter, etc. — just hidden under the hood and labeled a box. The cost also stays the same despite the title.

Despite its growing importance, automation-in-a-box remains a very loose term, meaning that different offerings greatly vary. For example, how big is the box? A photograph of the product would be a useful check on the physical size and whether it is one box or a bunch of boxes. Obviously, it is important to know exactly what the box does in its basic configuration. The list may include all or just some of the required functions, such as an automation controller, live video router, playout server, and graphics and/or logo inserter. The box may turn out to be a backbone that does not add up to a fully functional system, in which case options and other boxes may need to be added — moving away from the automation-in-a-box theme and adding to equipment and system installation costs.

Part of the attraction of the box solution is its implied lower cost, but if it works out to about the same as traditional multibox (extra servers, routers, etc.) options, you could be talking to the wrong supplier, or why even bother with the trendy box solution? Future-proofing can reduce later costs because it allows growth by adding functions such as titling, logos, live inputs and HD capability inside the box, hopefully as software (also avoiding the addition of more boxes). If the box is truly turnkey, it will operate right out of the packing case, reducing or totally removing additional engineering and installation costs. (See Figure 2.)

A hands-on trial is the best way to address all of the preceding concerns quickly and simply. You can verify that all the marketing claims correspond to the real thing, as well as establish if the product is truly available now and not still on the drawing board.

Requirements

Figure 2. The automation-in-a-box system includes the server and branding keyer functions in the same box as the controller.

Figure 2. The automation-in-a-box system includes the server and branding keyer functions in the same box as the controller.
Select image to enlarge.

Having checked everything and received the trial system, how can we be sure it is the best of breed? For this, let's get back to basics. The main purpose of a broadcast automation system is to automate the broadcast process and make it as robust as possible. A typical broadcast system contains a main content track and secondary elements such as squeeze backs, channel branding (titling and logos), captions, subtitles and audio. Logically, the best automation-in-a-box should efficiently provide all of these in a single box.

An ideal box has to fulfill all the functions and capabilities expected of modern broadcasting, including running a channel continuously in a fully automated mode for months without user intervention. For maximum reliability, a second channel running in sync with the first provides full redundancy. The workflow starts with importing and executing schedules from any type of flat-text or comma-separated file. Then the content is ingested as necessary in the schedule from as many sources as required, including ASI, IP, SDI and analog. Also, the box should be able to synchronize its local storage with the central storage system, based on the schedules, and automatically maintain sufficient free space.

Support for today's most popular compression types, including MPEG-2, DV, H.264 and WMV, is essential, as is reading all the industry-standard containers, such as MXF, MOV, MPG, AVI, DV, etc. Operating as a truly open system means the box works not only with its own ingested files, but also directly with third-party content files. This can make a huge difference on workflow and should accommodate any legacy formats, such as archives. But beware, because some manufacturers claim they support every format. Look for the words “directly” or “natively.” If it's not specifically labeled as such, then the system probably relies on a converter that transforms the external formats to internal at the expense of processing time and resources, which leads to more space required, quality degradation, etc.

Operation

Users should be able to freely intervene at any point of the schedule to run live shows from the same box, together with the automated schedules. This means switching between content playing from the box and live inputs, video or streams from various inputs, without the need for additional configuration. Outputs need to be configurable either as SDI video or as an ASI/IP compressed stream.




Want to use this article?
Click here for options!
Get Copyright Clearance

Share this article

blog comments powered by Disqus

 


Current Issue

A view from the top

January 2012

Some of broadcast's brightest reveal where the industry is headed.

Read More articles...

Related Newsletter

Automation Technology Update
A twice-monthly newsletter covering the world of automation technology.

Related Posts


Confused about the terminology in an article? Find definitions of common terms and abbreviations in Broadcast Engineering's Glossary.

 


Submit your product for our NAB coverage.

Resources

Broadcast Engineering Newsletters Broadcast Engineering Essential Guides Broadcast Engineering White Papers Broadcast Engineering Videos Broadcast Engineering Podcasts Broadcast Engineering Industry Calendar

Industry Calendar

Broadcast Engineering Glossary of Terms

Glossary

Broadcast Engineering RSS feed

RSS

Interactive Media

Broadcast Engineering Webinars Broadcast Engineering Training Broadcast Engineering Blogs Broadcast Engineering Mobile Apps Broadcast Engineering on Facebook

Facebook

Broadcast Engineering JobZone

JobZone

Broadcast Engineering BE Roll

Blog

Featured Products

A Broadcaster's Guide To Camera & Lens Technology

A Broadcaster's Guide To Camera & Lens TechnologyThis eBook provides both new and veteran shooters an in-depth understanding of the technology that lies between the camera lens and the recording medium and how to maximize a camera's performance.

File Based Technology and Workflow

File Based Technology and WorkflowFile-based technologies have replaced video tape methods for a majority of production and broadcast operations. The worlds of AV and IT are coalescing to create new methods and workflows for media

Digital Television Fundamentals

Digital Television FundamentalsThis course, written by broadcast engineer Phil Cianci, provides a basic tutorial platform on the hows and whys of ATSC digital operation.

Video Compression, Editing and Displays

Video Compression, Editing and DisplaysVideo compression, editing and displays is an in-depth tutorial on MPEG compression technology, editing MPEG content and evaluating color video monitors written by long-time video expert, trainer and writer Steve Mullen, Ph. D.

 

 

Sound Off Podcasts

Erik Moreno, co-general manager of the Mobile Content Venture

MCV racks up successes on way to bright mobile DTV future

2012 will be the year of mobile DTV. That’s the view of Erik Moreno, who along with Salil Dalvi, senior VP for Mobile Platform Development at NBC Universal, is co-general manager of the Mobile Content Venture.

Danny Wilson

OTT year in review

Hear snippets of podcast interviews done throughout 2011 with Pat McDonough of The Nielsen Company, Glen Friedman of Ideas & Solutions!, Danny Wilson of Pixelmetrix and Greg Herman of Watch TV. Pictured is Danny Wilson, Pixelmetrix.

 

Broadcast Engineering Digital Reference Guide

Browse Back Issues

Back to Top