Brad on Broadcast

3D is dead--long live 4K

As 3D fades from the scene, 4K appears to be the next technology mountain engineers may need to climb.

A recent article in Forbes magazine was titled; “3D TV Is Dead, Long Live 4K”. It continued, “3D is still popular enough at the box-office that we may not be rid of it in movie theatres any time soon, but if CES 2013 is any indication this year, the much-touted 3D TVs of years past are no more”.

Similar to 2010, the 2013 consumer electronics industry has decided the next great thrill will come from everyone buying another hugely expensive television. Never mind the small detail that the new, so-called, 4K televisions aren’t really capable of displaying a true 4K image. Besides 4K doesn’t sound sexy, so CES came up with a better term, “Ultra HD”.

But Ultra HD and 4K are not the same thing, warns Patrick-Pierre Garcia, an expert in both pro and consumer video topics. “The UltraHD format has a horizontal resolution of only 3,840 pixels whereas the 4K format has 4,096 pixels. There’s nothing secret about this. UHD and 4K are official formats and I don’t understand why the CE industry is confusing consumers by calling UltraHD products, 4K,” 4K content will still have to be downscaled to UltraHD and then downscale again to HD because, unlike Sony said, there is no such thing as an UltraHD Blu-ray.”

If the consumer isn’t yet confused hang on because Shape uses the term “Quad HD” for it’s 3.8K televisions. So, now we’ll see commercials for Ultra HD, 4K and Quad HD televisions. It’s enough to make a buyer’s head spin.

Even so, while the consumer industry battles for the next big sales, there may actually be good reasons for broadcasters to build 4K infrastructures. A preview of some of those benefits can be found in this article by Stan Moote, VP Business Development, Harris Broadcast. He notes that many engineers believe that 4K is just another 3D. Something to be tolerated, not supported. But Stan has a different viewpoint and I encourage you to read the article.

There are other good reasons to support some implementation of 4K. Sports for one.  Just last month, CBS used six FOR-A FT-ONE 4K cameras for the Super Bowl. Last month Japan announced it will broadcast the World Cup in 2014 in 4K. Even the 2012 Summer Olympics in London were available in 4K at selected public venues, but no DTH broadcasts.

In The Verge, writer David Peirce notes that 4K cameras could enable more accurate referee calls when reviews are necessary. In one late season play, Indianapolis Colts quarter back Andrew Luck attempts a pass just as he is tackled. His pass is intercepted and the defender runs for a touchdown. The refs review the play and call it an interception, touchdown stands.

However, Pierce got to look at the CBS 4K imagery and it clearly shows that Luck’s knee was on the ground as he attempted the pass. The field ruling should have been incomplete pass, no touchdown. Ouch!

Better technology is useful in making such important ref calls. And more accurate imagery can enhance the viewer experience. But in cases like this, fans will still shout, “Hey ref, you blind.”

Will you consider 4K technology for your facility? Is it on your buy list for NAB 2013? Join the conversation below.

 

Discuss this Blog Entry 14

G. Shepherd (not verified)
on Feb 15, 2013

We have not even become accustomed to 1080, nor do we use its capabilities. The distribution of content with excess compression fails to deliver the true HD signal to the user with the end result being a mediocre quality product. Starting with a 4K signal and then crunching it down to 10 Mbps or less so we can pass it through the pipe to the end user seems like a waste.

G. Shepherd (not verified)
on Feb 15, 2013

We have not even become accustomed to 1080, nor do we use its capabilities. The distribution of content with excess compression fails to deliver the true HD signal to the user with the end result being a mediocre quality product. Starting with a 4K signal and then crunching it down to 10 Mbps or less so we can pass it through the pipe to the end user seems like a waste.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 18, 2013

3D wont die until Hollywood stops producing 3D content (OBTW not happening too soon) or until the set Manufacturers stop making 3D sets! You cant buy a high end HD set at this time that isnt Web enabled or 3D ready! There is more 3D TV content being produced in the US Europe and China than ever before! Just because forbes doesnt like it doesnt mean its dead as a medium 3D is alive well and still thriving! The articles author simply doesnt like 3D because he is dissinterested in the product or simply cant handle it! Personally i look forward to SKY's F1 experiment which really sould bring a different dimension to F1 racing!

producer42
on Feb 18, 2013

3D wont die as long as the manufacturers are making HD sets that are web enabled and 3D ready! I am looking forward to skyes experiment wit F1 racing! 3D thrives in Hollywood, in Europe China Australia and at ESPN!

producer42
on Feb 18, 2013

3D wont die as long as the manufacturers are making HD sets that are web enabled and 3D ready! I am looking forward to Skye's experiment with F1 racing! 3D thrives in Hollywood with movies in Europe China Australia and at ESPN in broadcast tv!

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 21, 2013

We all know how "Happy" everyone was two years a go when we all had to go and buy a new tv set so we could watch tv, just think how happy everyone will be haveing to go buy a 4K tv next year. :)

RG (not verified)
on Feb 22, 2013

The younger generations, more accustomed to high def video and clear images on mobile devices are definitely going to move toward superior definition. 3D is a sit down experience, definitely a worthwhile novelty. To a generation of TV viewers with eye strain issues from over using visual devices, better definition is a good pony to bet on.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 27, 2013

Never mind the fact that none of the cable, satellite, internet providers have enough bandwidth for the current format without newer methods of compression.... never mind that a 2 hour movie would require 2 blu-ray discs to store... streaming @ 1 Gbit/S I dont even want to think about how expensive that connection will be.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 28, 2013

UHDTV resolution is 8K, Super Hi-Vision also known as UHDTV, it is an 8K resolution or 7,680 x 4,320 pixels was tested by NHK and the BBC during the 2012 Olympics in London.
NHK and the BBC sent the uncompressed UHDTV signal at 24 Gbit/s to viewing centers on a 20GBps connection over eight wavelengths optical fiber link carrying the UHDTV uncompressed at 24 Gbit/s over eight wavelengths.
It took 16 HD recorders For recording the 24 Gbit/s UHDTV signal.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 1, 2013

If Andrew Luck's knee was down it would be a sack, not an incomplete pass.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 1, 2013

If Andrew Luck's knee was down it would be a sack, not an incomplete pass.

yonchenko
on Mar 13, 2013

All of this expensive engineering just to confirm that Andrew Luck was sacked. The refs may like it but consumers won't care enough to spend the money especially when 4K will need to be compressed for us to see what is coming out of a 4K camera. Manufacturers are desperate to find new technology to sell because the market may be saturated. Consumers may have had enough of the constant changes in formats. Sometimes good enough is, well, good enough.

Philip (not verified)
on Mar 15, 2013

3D will not go away any time soon 4K will take another 2 years to get noticed.

Anonymous (not verified)
on May 4, 2013

probably 3+ years until hardware catch up the software base that includes fixing the bugs

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Broadcast Engineering ID
(optional)
What's Brad on Broadcast?

Broadcast Engineering editorial director Brad Dick offers his thoughts and insights on the changes in the industry.

Blog Archive