Broadcast Engineering Blog

Ask The Experts: Do we care enough to solve Internet piracy?

I'll admit straight up: About 90 percent of the time that I'm online, I never consider from where an image or file may have originated. So, if I want to hammer away at my own lax standard, it's pretty easy to argue that I really don't care about Internet piracy.

Hey, at least I own it, and this is coming from someone whose career at least keeps the issue topical on occasion.

Problem is, though, it seems as if it is the same conversation every time: Someone is upset that they aren't getting paid for content or files or intellectual rights that "somehow" became available to the world's online community. Ever since Metallica went to war with Napster, suits have flown fast and furiously. Just ask Limewire (sued multiple times including in 2004 and again last year... for $75 trillion). Content producers have even gone after individuals — all in the name of cracking down on piracy.

Is attempting to protect your already protected content wrong? Of course not. But, the timeline from over the last decade shows the much larger issue — way bigger than a few folks who may or may not have been acting on some sort of sinister agenda and leaking unreleased music or film to a competitor or the public.

The issue is most folks are like me. We don't care enough to stop it. And, for those of us who sometimes do, a large percentage of that group can't even tell if what they have or receive is illegal content at all. London-based Ofcom just released a study earlier this week that illustrates how widespread sharing apathy truly is.

According to the study, 47 percent of those studied in the UK were unsure whether the content they consumed was legally obtained. Almost half! Many reactionary pieces immediately cried for better education among consumers. I'd say it's less about knowledge and more about casual saaviness, considering more than half (54 percent) consumed illegally simply because it was free. In other words, if it's there, why not? There's no honor system in today's online world.

Therefore, since it has been from the beginning, the onus has been on content creators, producers and gatekeepers to determine the best way to protect their artistic wares. Much is made about security in our broadcasting industry these days. But, while security programs and protocols continue to improve, I ask you Experts, is it somewhat a waste of time when consumers really aren't concerned with even knowing if what they have obtained is legal or not?

Leave your comments below.

Discuss this Blog Entry 4

ethicalfan (not verified)
on Nov 21, 2012

US law says that ISPs only have safe harbor from their subscribers illegally distributing content if they have a policy for terminating repeat infringers (17 USC 512 (i). If they were doing this, 42% of all US internet upstream traffic wouldn't be used to illegally distribute music, movies, games, software and ebooks. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics says that musicians wages are down 45% since p2p technology arrived. US Home video sales (DVD, BluRay, PayTV, VOD, Streaming) are down 25% to $18.5B in 2011 from $25B in 2006.
The first BitTorrent search engines debuted in 2004. Recorded music is down worldwide from $27B in 1999 (Napster) to $15B in 2011. Video Game revenue is down 13% from 2007. In the meantime broadband revenues grew from zero to $50B a year in the US with p2p as the killer app that drove broadband adoption. Those are real jobs lost that are not coming back until the public realizes that these are your friends and neighbors whose careers are being destroyed by lack of copyright enforcement. Who is destroying these industries? ISPs who ignore the law 17 USC 512 (i) and do not terminate repeat infringers. US Telecom makes >$400B a year, creative industries less than <$80B a year. Verizon $120B a year, Viacom (CBS, MTV & Paramount Pictures) $14B a year, Warner Music Group $2.4B a year.

ethicalfan (not verified)
on Nov 22, 2012

It amazing to see such a cavalier attitude about how the $400B US telecom business had helped to cut economic opportunity for US musicians in half. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics says that musicians incomes are down 45% in the US since p2p technology. You have a different attitude if your industry was the one being sacked.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Nov 27, 2012

Copyright infringement is a bogey man. Musicians have been getting shafted by executives forever, and imaginary theft is one more excuse they can use. I'm sure LEGAL music services iTunes/Amazon/Pandora/etc. have seriously cut into the traditional one-good-song-per-album model that was previously so profitable.

No doubt DVD sales have also been impacted by the perfectly legal Netflix service, as well as Amazon, iTunes, and Hulu.

Blaming piracy without any evidence to support it is the last refuge of the scoundrel. Find a study that says piracy is costing money, and I bet there's another out there that says piracy is generating more sales.

Not that I want to defend actual bootlegging and whatnot, but it's an imagined problem more than a real one. And what's more, the steps being suggested to control it have very real and very serious negative consequences on the public at large.

Dennis Nilsson (not verified)
on Dec 24, 2012

Is it not time to reform the copyright?

Recommend reading of the book "Copyright Unbalanced - A free-market case for copyright reform": http://mercatus.org/copyrightunbalanced/

Copyright Unbalanced is Not only a deep respect for property rights compatible with recognizing that our current copyright system is flawed, but opposition to a bloated copyright system that serves special interests at the expense of the public.

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Broadcast Engineering ID
(optional)
What's Broadcast Engineering Blog?

Our newsletter writers air their personal views about what ever is topical in these times of great change within the broadcast sector.

Blog Archive