Managing the difficult

May 1, 2003 12:00 PM, BY PAUL MCGOLDRICK

    

Anybody who has been a manager for any length of time has had a “difficult” employee. Fortunately in my career I can say that just about every such difficult person is somebody that I inherited from a previous regime. There was a lady, for example, who always seemed to be up to something — other than work. One time she was slyly watching the soaps on a TV hidden under her desk; another time she was taking orders on the telephone for her part-time janitorial supply business. She was always hiding something. It was like dealing with a child who thinks that its parents are blind and stupid.

I've even had employees who have responded to “Why do you think you are still working here?” with “Because you like me?” Or the employee I suspended after we found he had placed unauthorized advertising: Before he left the building we had a conversation to make sure there was “nothing else” out there. He said there wasn't — and then 20 minutes later, a dealer called to find out why he was supposed to keep quiet about some co-op advertising. The suspension turned into a termination.

I believe that quite a few difficult employees have just learned a behavior that helps them survive. It is a bit like the way most of us behaved when we were bullied on the school playground. You do something that makes you less vulnerable — less visible. We don't want to resolve the problem, we want it to go away. Or we go away.

Many managers allow these people to actually kidnap the work environment. But the first time you give in to what is often an unreasonable demand, you are hooked for the next time. As the advice columnists preach, “You allow yourself to be taken advantage of.” When the employee's behavior was allowed by the previous manager it is very difficult to turn it around because the employee expects things to continue as they were. Seeing grown adults pout does not create a very happy workplace. But, at the same time, it is a great deal more profitable to be able to retain an employee than go through the costs of replacement and training.

My father was a born manager. He coaxed every positive thing possible out of his public sector employees, and they loved him for it. He pioneered the fight against dress codes that included hats for men. He persuaded very senior government employees to force disabled access in the workplace decades before it became a cause celebré. And one thing that he told me was that you have to visit your staff every day that you can. That paid handsomely for me and I adopted it 100 percent after I watched one of my own managers do exactly the same.

He would visit the labs and greet everybody by name and talk, on occasion, about the employee's family, dogs, whatever. He never criticized anything that he saw wrong, but as soon as he was back in his office on the top floor my telephone would ring. “Jones is leaving scope probes on the floor — they're expensive” or “Smith seemed to be on the telephone yet again when I went through.” He followed chain-of-command rules to the letter.

What's really important when dealing with unacceptable behavior is to go for the act, not the person. Go after behavior that you personally know about — not after rumors that have come to you from elsewhere. Have any discussion either alone or, if a chaperone is required or desirable, with a nonconfrontational member of the HR department. Time things right, keep eye contact, keep calm. Most of the time when you can keep the conversation to one about “us” as opposed to “them” things will get better. If a manager allows higher management to be perceived as the problem, then the behavior will never change.

We often know little about our employees' home life (and should be dissuaded from asking by the amount of litigation in the world out there today), and if the problem is there, then little can usually be done about the workplace behavior.

The types of problem people I have seen include: the jealous, the meddler, the “perhaps” person, the friendly-to-your-face person, the perfectionist, the bully, the avoider, the never-can-do person, and the complainer.

Have I really seen all these? You bet. Have you had other experiences you'd like to share with fellow readers?


Paul McGoldrick is an industry consultant based on the West Coast.

Send questions and comments to: paul_mcgoldrick@primediabusiness.com


Home | Back to the top | Write us





Want to use this article?
Click here for options!
Get Copyright Clearance

Share this article

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Brad on Broadcast


Tell us how you use social media in your job!
You could win 1 of 4 iTunes gift cards for your participation.

Current Issue

Online captioning compliance

May 2012

The FCC has issued captioning requirements for all online video. Learn how to meet the requirements of the new rules and how to automate the technical process.

Read More articles...


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

 


Video Compression, Editing and Displays

Video Compression, Editing and Displays

Video compression, editing and displays is an in-depth tutorial on MPEG compression technology, editing MPEG content and evaluating color video monitors written by long-time video expert, trainer and writer Steve Mullen, Ph. D.

File Based Technology and Workflow

File Based Technology and Workflow

File-based technologies have replaced video tape methods for a majority of production and broadcast operations. The worlds of AV and IT are coalescing to create new methods and workflows for media

Sound Off Podcasts

 

Broadcast Engineering Digital Reference Guide

Browse Back Issues

Back to Top