MPEG-2 to H.264 TRANSCODING: Why AND how?

Dec 1, 2006 12:00 PM, BY SANTHANA KRISHNAMACHARI AND KYEONG HO YANG

             

The MPEG-2 compression standard has been widely deployed in video distribution infrastructures, such as cable and satellite networks, as well as in several consumer applications, such as DVDs and DVRs. For more than 10 years, end-to-end systems have existed, with several million interoperable encoders, multiplexers and set-top boxes deployed. The need to transcode to and from the MPEG-2 format has arisen.

The need for transcoding

The following three scenarios describe the need for transcoding. First, improvements in compression techniques have resulted in mature new standards that offer significant bit rate gains of 30 percent to 50 percent over MPEG-2. Investments made in legacy devices that can only handle the MPEG-2 format and the existence of large amounts of content that was created using MPEG-2 necessitate that multiple standards will coexist for several years before the eventual conversion to a single standard.

Figure 1. Format transcoding for IPTV architectures
Click image to enlarge.

Second, emerging IPTV deployments of video over bandwidth constrained last mile will result in part of the content distribution chain migrating to H.264, thereby creating a need for efficient transcoders. (See Figure 1.)

Third, new applications, such as high-definition video and real-time broadcast video over handheld mobile devices, require that the same content be made available in several spatial resolutions and frame rate formats. This can be achieved by recreating the same content in several formats. Alternatively, it will be more efficient to create the content once and transcode it to different formats and resolutions as needed. (See Figure 2.)

Finally, improvements in programmable processor technologies, such as the DSPs and FPGAs, have made it possible for video processing vendors to field products that can handle multiple existing formats and field-upgrade the products for future emerging standards.

Types of transcoding

Several forms of transcoding are possible, depending on the specific parameters of the compressed bit stream that are modified during the transcoding process. They include:

Figure 2. Resolution transcoding to support multiple display devices

  • Bit rate transcoding

    This process changes the bit rate of the compressed bit stream while keeping the resolution, frame rate and the encoding format the same. MPEG-2 bit rate transcoders, also called rateshapers, have been widely deployed today, and they employ efficient, high-density rateshaping by primarily operating in the discrete cosine transform (DCT) domain.

  • Format transcoding

    This entails converting the compression format — for example, converting an MPEG-2 bit stream to an H.264 bit stream.

  • Resolution transcoding

    This involves the conversion of coded spatial resolution — for example, converting a standard-resolution bit stream to common intermediate format (CIF) resolution for a mobile application.





Want to use this article?
Click here for options!
Get Copyright Clearance

Share this article

blog comments powered by Disqus

 


Current Issue

A view from the top

January 2012

Some of broadcast's brightest reveal where the industry is headed.

Read More articles...

Related Newsletter

Transition to Digital
A twice per month tutorial on digital technology.

Related Posts


Confused about the terminology in an article? Find definitions of common terms and abbreviations in Broadcast Engineering's Glossary.

 


Submit your product for our NAB coverage.

Resources

Broadcast Engineering Newsletters Broadcast Engineering Essential Guides Broadcast Engineering White Papers Broadcast Engineering Videos Broadcast Engineering Podcasts Broadcast Engineering Industry Calendar

Industry Calendar

Broadcast Engineering Glossary of Terms

Glossary

Broadcast Engineering RSS feed

RSS

Interactive Media

Broadcast Engineering Webinars Broadcast Engineering Training Broadcast Engineering Blogs Broadcast Engineering Mobile Apps Broadcast Engineering on Facebook

Facebook

Broadcast Engineering JobZone

JobZone

Broadcast Engineering BE Roll

Blog

Featured Products

A Broadcaster's Guide To Camera & Lens Technology

A Broadcaster's Guide To Camera & Lens TechnologyThis eBook provides both new and veteran shooters an in-depth understanding of the technology that lies between the camera lens and the recording medium and how to maximize a camera's performance.

File Based Technology and Workflow

File Based Technology and WorkflowFile-based technologies have replaced video tape methods for a majority of production and broadcast operations. The worlds of AV and IT are coalescing to create new methods and workflows for media

Digital Television Fundamentals

Digital Television FundamentalsThis course, written by broadcast engineer Phil Cianci, provides a basic tutorial platform on the hows and whys of ATSC digital operation.

Video Compression, Editing and Displays

Video Compression, Editing and DisplaysVideo compression, editing and displays is an in-depth tutorial on MPEG compression technology, editing MPEG content and evaluating color video monitors written by long-time video expert, trainer and writer Steve Mullen, Ph. D.

 

 

Sound Off Podcasts

Erik Moreno, co-general manager of the Mobile Content Venture

MCV racks up successes on way to bright mobile DTV future

2012 will be the year of mobile DTV. That’s the view of Erik Moreno, who along with Salil Dalvi, senior VP for Mobile Platform Development at NBC Universal, is co-general manager of the Mobile Content Venture.

Danny Wilson

OTT year in review

Hear snippets of podcast interviews done throughout 2011 with Pat McDonough of The Nielsen Company, Glen Friedman of Ideas & Solutions!, Danny Wilson of Pixelmetrix and Greg Herman of Watch TV. Pictured is Danny Wilson, Pixelmetrix.

 

Broadcast Engineering Digital Reference Guide

Browse Back Issues

Back to Top