Lack of broadband critical mass, content aggregation plague Tier 2, 3 IPTV deployment

Jan 22, 2008 8:20 AM


         Subscribe in NewsGator Online   Subscribe in Bloglines
The ability to scale an IPTV system is critical to the futureproofing a telco TV network, says Manish Matta, director of marketing for UTStarcom.

The ability to scale an IPTV system is critical to the futureproofing a telco TV network, says Manish Matta, director of marketing for UTStarcom.

UTStarcom, which offers an integrated IPTV solution dubbed RollingStream IPTV, has been building momentum in the international market, most recently with the announcement late last year of its third IPTV contract in Asia.

The company describes the RollingStream IPTV solution as “an open system, single vendor, end-to-end approach” that offers the flexibility to work with third-party components if a telco so desires. Given concern on the part of some telcos that best-of-breed approaches can be difficult to implement, manage and scale, IPTV Update thought it made sense to speak with Manish Matta, director of marketing for UTStarcom, about how UTStarcom approaches the market.

Specifically, IPTV Update wanted to learn Matta’s perspective on how IPTV roll outs in the United States compare with international deployments as well as how UTStarcom’s single-vendor, yet inclusive, approach is playing out.

IPTV Update: Given your involvement across the globe in IPTV deployments, what is your perspective on why IPTV deployments by Tier 2 and Tier 3 telcos in the United States are lagging?

Manish Matta: The United States has the luxury of rich television content — whether it be through broadcast TV or VOD. Tier 1 operators in the U.S. have had a difficult time deploying and provisioning a scalable solution that is feature-rich and competes with the current TV offerings from cable and satellite operators for various reasons, and Tier 2 and Tier 3 operators in the U.S. face similar obstacles — intense competition from existing cable and satellite operators, scalability issues, etc.

However, there are two major obstacles in the path of the Tier 2 and Tier 3 operators. One is the lack of critical mass in terms of the number of broadband subscribers on their networks, and the other is content aggregation at an effective cost that would make the business case profitable.

IPTV Update: How would you assess deployment in the United States by Tier 1 telcos, and do they face some of the same hurdles confronting IPTV deployment by smaller players?

Manish Matta: Tier 1 operators have the critical mass to make the business case profitable. However, the problem faced by the Tier 1 operators is one of scalability and network architecture. These issues are well documented by analysts and media. The problem arises in scaling the network at a cost-effective manner and ensuring voice network-like reliability at all times. This has proven to be a daunting task for the Tier 1 operators in the U.S. Besides that, competition from cable and satellite operators continues to be a major hurdle. The inability to truly differentiate their offering and provide the revenue-generating applications and functionalities that go beyond table stakes has been another significant problem.

IPTV Update: How serious of an impediment to successful IPTV deployment is integration and interoperability of software and support from multiple IPTV vendors?

Manish Matta: That is a very interesting point and something that UTStarcom identified at inception. Because of this issue, we decided to go with an open system, single vendor, end-to-end approach for our RollingStream IPTV solution, which means that while we provide and position the end-to-end system capability right from the STB to the encoder to our customers, we are also willing and capable of integrating a third-party preferred vendor for any operator for specific parts of the network if they ask.

For instance, in some networks, we have incorporated a preferred vendor’s encoder in our end-to-end system. This is enabled via our open system promise. However, the difference in our approach is that we are the single point of contact for any issues for our customers. We provide the integration of our solutions whether they are 100 percent our products or if we have integrated some other components from other vendors. Our underlying common network management solution provides the management capability for all of our solutions whether it be NGN, IPTV or broadband, which ensures, among other things, significant OPEX savings for the operators. We are the single point of contact for our customers, and this is one of our inherent value propositions.


Commenting terms of use blog comments powered by Disqus

Want to use this article?
Click here for options!
Get Copyright Clearance

--->

Related Newsletter

IPTV Technology Update
provides readers with the latest news on build-outs, projects, new technology and breaking-edge new products.

Confused about the termnology in an article? Find definitions of common terms and abbreviations in Broadcast Engineering's Glossary.

 

Browse Back Issues

Resources

Broadcast Engineering Newsletters Broadcast Engineering Essential Guides Broadcast Engineering White Papers Broadcast Engineering Videos Broadcast Engineering Podcasts Broadcast Engineering Buyers Guide Broadcast Engineering Industry Calendar

Industry Calendar

Broadcast Engineering Glossary of Terms

Glossary

Broadcast Engineering RSS feed

RSS

Interactive Media

Broadcast Engineering Webinars Broadcast Engineering Training Broadcast Engineering Blogs Broadcast Engineering Forums Broadcast Engineering JobZone

JobZone

Broadcast Engineering BE Roll

Blog

 

Back to Top