Losing the race

Mar 1, 2003 12:00 PM, Brad Dick editorial director

    

Hey, I don't mind a race, but I want a fair race. And, I'm not against competition, in fact, I believe in competition. What's not good for anyone is when one industry is given unfair access to the customer through government mandate. That's called preferential treatment, not competition.

TV broadcasters continue to be, dare I use the word, discriminated against by the FCC. Broadcasters carry an unfair burden of antiquated, obsolete and burdensome legislation created by years of congressional, presidential and FCC mismanagement. Whether it's the costs of DTV implementation that no other industry has incurred, ownership caps that artificially affect market conditions, diversity/EEO/special treatments that restrict sales or the $500 million/year tax on analog broadcasters, TV broadcasters are increasingly being burdened by unreasonable regulations.

Broadcast Engineering recently hosted a DTV seminar where attendees examined the causes and effects of legislation, technology and market conditions on stations. What we learned is that stations are finding it increasingly difficult to remain profitable or even stay on the air with the new onerous conditions placed on them by Congress and the FCC. Let's take a closer look at a couple of the reasons broadcasters are struggling.

First, DTV is expensive. Every broadcaster I talk with mentions the money they've had to spend in converting to DTV. Many have invested huge sums, even millions of dollars, just to meet the FCC's arbitrary requirements to begin broadcasting DTV signals.

Second, while the FCC just loves regulating broadcasters, it avoids regulating cable. Just three years ago this month I blasted the ever-political suck-up FCC chairman William Kennard. I said then, “When it comes to protection from regulation, Kennard sucks up to cable like a newborn calf to a wet teat.” Three years later, even without that worthless chairman, the FCC is still doing the same thing. In fact, it's now added the consumer electronic manufacturers to that same suck-up list. “Let's not regulate DTV receiver performance. That's not within the FCC's prerogative,” says the Commission.

Third, market conditions are vastly different now then they were 10 years ago. Broadcasters need the freedom to build, buy, sell and group stations according to what the market needs, and not what some politician decides.

And please don't give me the crap about “It's the public's spectrum.” If you want to go down that path, I'll bury you in valid comparisons to other so-called public resources (like water, air, forests, land) and the industries that use them — all absolutely free. Broadcasters give back to their communities far more than what they are given credit for.

Broadcasters just want the chance to compete on a level playing field. Loosen the restrictions on doing simple business. Require others to operate under the same rules and guidelines as we must, and there will be no complaints. Failure by the Commission to allow broadcasters to compete equally will have catastrophic consequences.

Send comments to:editor@primediabusiness.comwww.broadcastengineering.com


Home | Back to the top | Write us





Want to use this article?
Click here for options!
Get Copyright Clearance

Share this article

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Brad on Broadcast


Tell us how you use social media in your job!
You could win 1 of 4 iTunes gift cards for your participation.

Current Issue

Online captioning compliance

May 2012

The FCC has issued captioning requirements for all online video. Learn how to meet the requirements of the new rules and how to automate the technical process.

Read More articles...


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

 


Video Compression, Editing and Displays

Video Compression, Editing and Displays

Video compression, editing and displays is an in-depth tutorial on MPEG compression technology, editing MPEG content and evaluating color video monitors written by long-time video expert, trainer and writer Steve Mullen, Ph. D.

File Based Technology and Workflow

File Based Technology and Workflow

File-based technologies have replaced video tape methods for a majority of production and broadcast operations. The worlds of AV and IT are coalescing to create new methods and workflows for media

Sound Off Podcasts

 

Broadcast Engineering Digital Reference Guide

Browse Back Issues

Back to Top