Cross-country moves

Aug 1, 2009 12:00 PM, By Harry C. Martin

Two stations ask to move from Nevada and Wyoming to compete in the Philadelphia and New York markets.

    

Two small Western-state TV stations have notified the FCC that they plan on moving from Nevada and Wyoming to Delaware and New Jersey, where they would compete in the Philadelphia and New York markets, respectively. Strangely enough, existing law may support these moves.

Background

When the FCC first allocated TV frequencies, only two states — New Jersey and Delaware — did not receive commercial VHF allotments. Recognizing this inequity, in 1982 Congress enacted Section 331(a) of the Communications Act, which mandates the FCC's policy to allocate commercial VHF TV channels such that “not less than one such channel shall be allocated to each state, if technically feasible.” And if a commercial VHF licensee notifies the FCC that it is willing to have its channel moved to a community with no VHF commercial station, then the commission “shall” order the reallocation and grant the license modification.

The technical feasibility condition kept Delaware from obtaining any local VHF channels in the next 27 years due to the need to protect stations in nearby Baltimore, Philadelphia and New York. But in New Jersey, the owners of New York station WOR-TV, then on VHF Channel 9, were embroiled in a difficult license renewal contest. Taking advantage of Section 331, they asked the FCC to reallocate their channel from New York to Secaucus, NJ. This resolved the renewal problem, and New Jersey had its first commercial VHF TV station.

In reallocating TV channels for DTV, the FCC again did not allot any commercial VHF channels to New Jersey or Delaware. This meant that once the old Secaucus station moved from Channel 9 to DTV Channel 38, New Jersey would once again have no commercial VHF station, while Delaware never had one.

The proposal

Viewing these facts and law as an opportunity, an enterprising broadcaster bought VHF TV stations on DTV Channel 3 in the Ely, NV, population 4040, and DTV Channel 2 in Jackson, WY, population 9038. The broadcaster then notified the FCC that it wanted to move its two stations to Middletown Township, NJ, and Wilmington, DE, respectively, and asked for the license modifications necessary to accommodate the moves.

Operation of the stations in Middletown Township and Wilmington will not technically foreclose continued use of Channels 3 and 2 in Ely and Jackson. The commission could easily reallocate those channels back to the communities on a permanent basis. And it could grant interim operating authority to deserving “eligible entities” (small businesses) such as the ones the commission has been seeking to promote through its diversification initiatives. The proponent of the moves to Delaware and New Jersey has even offered to provide interim low-power TV service to Ely from an LPTV station it is acquiring in that market.

The FCC has yet to react to this proposal, but if it follows Section 331, Delaware will have its own full-power commercial VHF station for the first time, and New Jersey's full-power commercial VHF service will be restored.


Harry C. Martin is a member of Fletcher, Heald and Hildreth, PLC.

Send questions and comments to: harry.martin@penton.com

Dateline

  • For noncommercial TV stations in Iowa and Missouri only, the biennial ownership report deadline is Oct. 1.

  • Oct. 1 is the deadline for TV stations in Iowa and Missouri to electronically file their broadcast EEO midterm reports (Form 397) with the FCC.

  • Oct. 1 is the deadline for TV stations licensed in the following states to place their annual EEO reports in their public files: Alaska, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Missouri, Oregon, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and Washington.

  • Nov. 1 is the deadline for submission of biennial ownership reports for commercial TV stations in all states and territories.




Want to use this article?
Click here for options!
Get Copyright Clearance

Share this article

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Current Issue

Online captioning compliance

May 2012

The FCC has issued captioning requirements for all online video. Learn how to meet the requirements of the new rules and how to automate the technical process.

Read More articles...

Related Newsletter

Transition to Digital
Provides readers with weekly timely updates on FCC actions, industry news, and station build-out schedules.

Related Posts


Confused about the terminology in an article? Find definitions of common terms and abbreviations in Broadcast Engineering's Glossary.

 


Video Compression, Editing and Displays

Video Compression, Editing and Displays

Video compression, editing and displays is an in-depth tutorial on MPEG compression technology, editing MPEG content and evaluating color video monitors written by long-time video expert, trainer and writer Steve Mullen, Ph. D.

File Based Technology and Workflow

File Based Technology and Workflow

File-based technologies have replaced video tape methods for a majority of production and broadcast operations. The worlds of AV and IT are coalescing to create new methods and workflows for media

Sound Off Podcasts

 

Broadcast Engineering Digital Reference Guide

Browse Back Issues

Back to Top