Joint request seeks additional time to complete 2GHz BAS relocation

Feb 9, 2010 12:34 PM

    

As the 2GHz Broadcast Auxiliary Service relocation effort approaches completion, 28 designated market areas (DMAs) were not expected to meet the Feb. 8 deadline and should be given relocation deadlines on a market-specific basis, according to a joint request filed Feb. 1 with the FCC’s Office of Engineering and Technology.

The filing from Sprint Nextel, the Association for Maximum Service Television (MSTV), NAB and the Society of Broadcast Engineers (SBE) modifies a joint request made Dec. 31, 2009, in which the parties told the commission that nine DMAs would need until Aug. 9 to complete the relocation. Other DMAs also would require an extension, but were expected to complete the project before Aug. 9, the filing said.

Since the December filing, the project has proceeded, and 14 of 42 DMAs not expected to wrap up by the deadline have completed the transition. Fifteen of the remaining DMAs are expected to complete the transition by the end of March; four are expected to wrap up in April; seven in June; and only two will require until Aug. 9 to complete the transition to the new 2GHz BAS assignments.

The filing also pointed out that in the 28 DMAs yet to finish the project, nearly two-thirds of the stations in those markets are ready to relocate as soon as other stations in the market or adjacent markets make the switch.

An appendix to the filing identified DMAs and expected completion dates:

• February: St. Louis; Minot-Bismarck-Dickinson, ND; Missoula, MT.

• March: Columbus, OH; Buffalo, NY; Lexington, KY; Dayton, OH; Des Moines-Ames, IA; Honolulu, HI; Cedar Rapids-Waterloo-Iowa City-Dubuque, IA; Tri-Cities, TN-VA; Evansville, IN; Ft. Wayne, IN; Sioux City, IA; Butte-Bozeman, MT.

• April: Indianapolis, IN; Lafayette, IN; Davenport, IA – Rock Island-Moline, IL; Wausau-Rhinelander, WI.

• June: Portland, OR; Eugene, OR; Medford-Klamath Falls, OR; Bend OR; Spokane, WA; Yakima-Pasco-Richland-Kennewick, WA; Rochester, MN-Mason City, IA-Austin, MN.

• July: Albuquerque-Santa Fe, NM; Anchorage, AK.




Want to use this article?
Click here for options!
Get Copyright Clearance

Share this article

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Current Issue

Online captioning compliance

May 2012

The FCC has issued captioning requirements for all online video. Learn how to meet the requirements of the new rules and how to automate the technical process.

Read More articles...

Related Newsletter

Transition to Digital
Provides readers with weekly timely updates on FCC actions, industry news, and station build-out schedules.

Related Posts


Confused about the terminology in an article? Find definitions of common terms and abbreviations in Broadcast Engineering's Glossary.

 


Video Compression, Editing and Displays

Video Compression, Editing and Displays

Video compression, editing and displays is an in-depth tutorial on MPEG compression technology, editing MPEG content and evaluating color video monitors written by long-time video expert, trainer and writer Steve Mullen, Ph. D.

File Based Technology and Workflow

File Based Technology and Workflow

File-based technologies have replaced video tape methods for a majority of production and broadcast operations. The worlds of AV and IT are coalescing to create new methods and workflows for media

Sound Off Podcasts

 

Broadcast Engineering Digital Reference Guide

Browse Back Issues

Back to Top