Omneon Video Networks VP Product Management foresees automation woes at 60 frames per second

Dec 1, 2004 11:59 AM, HD Technology Update e-newsletter

             



WCPO-TV in Cincinnati, Ohio, has installed two Omneon SPECTRUM media server systems to create a unique digital workflow for production and playout.

Concluding the interview with Omneon Video Network’s VP Product Management Paul Turner, High Definition Technology Update’s conversation turned to a new wrinkle in HD implementation at television stations: 720p at 60 frames per second.

Turner said he foresees the 60fps standard forcing automation system manufacturers to rethink how the duration of commercials, programs and promos is counted.

HDTU: As the transition to digital picks up momentum at TV stations, can you predict any unanticipated “gotchas’?

Paul Turner: There is a fine point that seems to have bypassed many people at this point. In Europe, HD is 1080i running at 25fps. In the United States, 1080i is 24.97fps – essentially the same thing. In addition, 720p has been adopted at 29.97. However, 720p at 30fps can seem a little too jittery on the home set, even with internal frame doublers. 720p at 60fps is coming.

HDTU: Is that a problem for companies like Omneon?

Turner: That’s a wrinkle for server vendors. We have to double the amount of data we have to get out of the server. But that’s technically achievable. 720p at 60fps is achievable for the broadcast chain as well.

HDTU: So what’s the issue?

Turner: The question is how do you control it?

Automation systems are designed around 30fps. The entire time code system is based on 30fps. What happens to the automation system if 60fps are introduced?

Automation system vendors have yet to really consider it. Do they have to this second? No, it’s not fully ratified yet, but it is something the industry must consider.

Does the advent of the 60fps standard mean that we need to completely rethink time code? Do you treat frames as if they were fields so you don’t have to change the math much? What does it do in terms of duration? Most automation systems calculate time based on frames not fields.

HDTU: And the difference between field and frame-based time calculation will manifest itself every time a new on-air element is transmitted?

Turner: You may be OK for a one off. But if every element is off by a field period, over time you are going to drift off your schedule.

I only raise the flag because one of our engineers asked me, “How’s it going to be controlled?” That caused me to do a quick survey of the automation vendors, to understand their position. I found that few, if any, had considered the issue.

It is going to be an issue for automation partners. Most agree that you can’t have time code above 30 frames - that will definitely break something.

This is not an insurmountable issue, but it is something we must consider in the transition to HD.

For more information, read Part 1 and Part 2 of HDTU's interviews with Turner.

Tell us what you think!

HDTU invites response from our readers. Please submit your comments to editor@broadcastengineering.com. We’ll follow up with your comments in an upcoming issue.

Back to the top





Want to use this article?
Click here for options!
Get Copyright Clearance

Share this article

blog comments powered by Disqus

 


Submit your product for our NAB coverage.

Resources

Broadcast Engineering Newsletters Broadcast Engineering Essential Guides Broadcast Engineering White Papers Broadcast Engineering Videos Broadcast Engineering Podcasts Broadcast Engineering Industry Calendar

Industry Calendar

Broadcast Engineering Glossary of Terms

Glossary

Broadcast Engineering RSS feed

RSS

Interactive Media

Broadcast Engineering Webinars Broadcast Engineering Training Broadcast Engineering Blogs Broadcast Engineering Mobile Apps Broadcast Engineering on Facebook

Facebook

Broadcast Engineering JobZone

JobZone

Broadcast Engineering BE Roll

Blog

Featured Products

A Broadcaster's Guide To Camera & Lens Technology

A Broadcaster's Guide To Camera & Lens TechnologyThis eBook provides both new and veteran shooters an in-depth understanding of the technology that lies between the camera lens and the recording medium and how to maximize a camera's performance.

File Based Technology and Workflow

File Based Technology and WorkflowFile-based technologies have replaced video tape methods for a majority of production and broadcast operations. The worlds of AV and IT are coalescing to create new methods and workflows for media

Digital Television Fundamentals

Digital Television FundamentalsThis course, written by broadcast engineer Phil Cianci, provides a basic tutorial platform on the hows and whys of ATSC digital operation.

Video Compression, Editing and Displays

Video Compression, Editing and DisplaysVideo compression, editing and displays is an in-depth tutorial on MPEG compression technology, editing MPEG content and evaluating color video monitors written by long-time video expert, trainer and writer Steve Mullen, Ph. D.

 

 

Sound Off Podcasts

Erik Moreno, co-general manager of the Mobile Content Venture

MCV racks up successes on way to bright mobile DTV future

2012 will be the year of mobile DTV. That’s the view of Erik Moreno, who along with Salil Dalvi, senior VP for Mobile Platform Development at NBC Universal, is co-general manager of the Mobile Content Venture.

Danny Wilson

OTT year in review

Hear snippets of podcast interviews done throughout 2011 with Pat McDonough of The Nielsen Company, Glen Friedman of Ideas & Solutions!, Danny Wilson of Pixelmetrix and Greg Herman of Watch TV. Pictured is Danny Wilson, Pixelmetrix.

 

Broadcast Engineering Digital Reference Guide

Browse Back Issues

Back to Top