Government censors in broadcast studios?

The biggest story never reported may be headed to your newsroom.

What is in this article?:

Will official local boards of censors at each local radio and TV station ensure that stations comply with the FCC’s proposed new Localism, Balance and Diversity Doctrine or lose their license?

Now pending before the FCC is a proposal known as the Localism, Balance and Diversity Doctrine that would subject all local news content to government review and change.

Back with a vengeance

Like the "Die Hard" movie franchise, the Fairness Doctrine is back with vengeance, and this one’s as serious as a heart attack. Now pending before the FCC is a proposal known as the Localism, Balance and Diversity Doctrine that would subject all local news content to government review and change. Change would be ordered as it was under the old Fairness Doctrine by majority vote of 3 of 5 Commissioners, all of whom, by law, are Presidential appointees.

Commissioners are generally appointed because of their political backgrounds and are not necessarily experts in broadcasting or news. Each has personal political views. Three of five would once again have the power to pull, amend and change news stories and how they are presented, at will.

This time, the government proposes to add an official local board of censors at each local station to make sure the station complies. If not, the board is to recommend the station’s license to be revoked. This would apply to radio and TV news across the country. Networks would have to supply programs to stations that comply, or its affiliates would be in trouble. The FCC took control of the Internet last year and is now expanding its reach over its content and its news, too.

Because the rules are necessarily vague, it’s difficult to predict how three Commissioners will vote on a given subject. Under the threat of losing its license, stations would be easily intimidated if questions or investigations were to arise due to news coverage non-compliance. Internet organizations would also be controlled.

The idea of presenting balanced viewpoints may seem like a good idea, but the problem and threat is found in who decides. Even If local producers, reporters and stations decide, the decision of the three Commissioners in Washington will determine the outcome. Local stations will have to predict where Washington’s politics will lead those Commissioners at the local level. If a local station’s coverage doesn’t agree with Commission-approved politics, stations will have to change the stories.

Discuss this Article 10

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jan 20, 2013

well, the US media is already srtongly controlled, so Mr.Genachowski's new man at the studio will not change to much, just listen to any other media which is available from outside of the country and you will be surprised, how much is happening in the world

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jan 20, 2013

Hadn't heard of it. Googled it and he's right, this is being kept quiet and its chilling to say the least. Thanks BE for shining a light on it for us. I'm passing this story around my station.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jan 20, 2013

keep in mind that Dunham is hawking his new book - and by writing this article you're helping him to do it! You didn't even expend the journalistic effort to get an outside expert opinion on his theory that the new proposal and the old Fairness Doctrine are similar. You go on to take that theory for granted in your (undoubtedly google-searched) quotes from the white house. So unwittingly or not, this is just a shill piece for Dunham. thanks. It would have been nice to get some actual insight into this issue, I guess we'll have to look elsewhere for that.

Mnooch
on Jan 20, 2013

Heavy sigh....From my cursory research on line, Mr. Dunham appears to be another conspiracy theorist, who sees evil motives behind every tree. His initial take on the original Fairness Doctrine is full of conservative bogeymen, while the truth is only one radio station ever lost its license under Fairness Doctrine action. His wild-eyed promises of local censorship boards seated at the right hand of every News Director, checking on the hot line to make sure the news is in sync with the administration's agenda for the day is laughable on its face and speaks to a certain paranoia. Substitute the phrase 'Death Panels' or 'Second Amendment rights' and I think you'll see where this individual's over the top view of the future is coming from. Do we not have more to fear from large multinational corporate ownership of media outlets that homogenize their programming to the point where one almost becomes unrecognizable from the other?

I am glad Mr. Dunham and I live in a country where he can and should express his views. I can't wait to read his next treatise on the Tri Lateral commission and the coming one world government run by the United Nations.

roadring
on Jan 20, 2013

A broadcast station should be politically neutral, selling and stating facts and not opinions and "own preferred tendencies". What lately had happened in the US TV and Radio scene (Bush, Obama; etc.) is absolutely not acceptable. In these times broadcast stations are no longer responsible only locally, but worldwide.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jan 23, 2013

Most of the Fairness Doctrine problems started in the '60s under LBJ and Nixon. Does anyone else remember station GMs doing editorials at the end of newscasts?

Douglas S. Wolfe (not verified)
on Jan 23, 2013

This is abhorently wrong on so many levels. First guns, now the media? This is beginning to sound like Nazi Germany. Does this President intend to usurp the Constitution which he just vowed to uphold? You damn right he does. I hope he fully anticipates the logical consequences... Me and likeminded will never stand for this. This is a blatent attack on the first Amendment.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jan 23, 2013

You may be a couple of years behind, Mr. Dunham:
In June 2011, the Chairman and a subcommittee chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, both Republicans, said that the FCC, in response to their requests, had set a target date of August 2011 for removing the Fairness Doctrine and other "outdated" regulations from the FCC's rulebook.[48]

On August 22, 2011, the FCC formally voted to repeal the language that implemented the Fairness Doctrine, along with removal of more than eighty other rules and regulations, from the Federal Register following a White House executive order directing a "government-wide review of regulations already on the books", to eliminate unnecessary regulations.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jan 23, 2013

As of June 30, 2012, including boosters and translators (most of which, theoretically, could operate or stand for distinct stations if the primaries accepted lesser coverage), the FCC counts 30,436 broadcast stations. Even if you just count basic radio and TV stations alone, there are 16,865 outlets. In contrast, according to Stanford University, there were fewer than 14,000 newspapers in the US in 2011. These numbers tell me that, for all intents and purposes, THERE IS NO SCARCITY argument to be made to justify the FCC's control of the broadcast spectrum. That is, they have no proper role in deciding WHO gets to broadcast or WHAT they broadcast, at least, not if they rely on the idea that the electromagnetic spectrum is a "limited commons" that must be managed "in the public interest." A far simpler system could ensure that interference is policed properly. Broadcast transmitters (and streaming servers, these days) are the true and dominant "presses" of the modern world, and the FCC, as currently chartered, violates broadcasters' First Amendment rights every day it exists. When will the public wake up and demand that electronic publishers have the same rights as print publishers, and deserve the same constitutional protection of those rights?

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 5, 2013

I loose my license , Then I WILL go pirate and I mean 2fold 200,000 transmitters MOBILE, to spread the word . The FCC Spectrum Enforcement does not have a clue what they are in for !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Broadcast Engineering ID
(optional)

Ads by Google

Watch Broadcast Engineering at NAB

Read the NAB blog for the latest show news

Why Go Digital

Newsletter Block - Editable

Subscribe to our newsletters and get regular updates on the technology that most interests you.

Download Smart Playout Center