Loudness law goes into effect

The FCC will now begin enforcement of the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act, which was passed in the House and Senate more than a year ago.

Fines, if there are any, could reach $10,000 per infraction and will be levied onto the organization responsible for delivering the program, not the one that created it. 

If you don't annoy viewers, there won't be any complaints.

Today, a new law requiring television volume be at a consistent level across programming and commercials officially went into effect, although broadcasters have known about and prepared for the mandate, and potential fines, for years. The main culprit to date has been the level of locally produced commercials.

As per the new mandate, the FCC will now begin enforcement of the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act, or CALM, which was passed in the House and Senate more than a year ago. Broadcasters and cable operators were given a grace period to update their equipment. That grace period is now over, though some smaller stations were allowed to petition for extensions.

“Loud television commercials that make consumers run for the mute button or change the channel altogether will be a thing of the past,” said U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-CA), who sponsored the initial bill in the House.

Television stations will be responsible for monitoring the volume of network, syndicated and local advertising spots. Cable operators also are responsible for monitoring the volume of local and national commercials. Fines, if there are any, could reached $10,000 per infraction and will be levied onto the organization responsible for delivering the program, not the one that created it. Enforcement will be challenging, although the FCC will monitor viewer complaints as a means to identify non-compliance with the new law.

“If you don't annoy the viewer, there won't be any complaints; that’s one way to avoid fines,” said Ken Hunold, staff engineer, audio production at Dolby Labs.

Hunold has helped numerous stations at both the network and local levels install loudness monitoring equipment properly.

“The tools to do this are already available," he said. "Broadcasters just need to get their arms around how to apply them."

Most U.S. broadcasters appear ready, as suppliers of equipment that monitor and automatically adjust loudness levels all report an increase in business over the past 18 months. Indeed, the audio production technology manufacturing community has been talking about little else the past three years.

“We already had the majority of the equipment that was required to comply with the CALM Act and have been keeping our audio levels consistent,” Ray Carter, VP and general manager of WPXI-TV in Pittsburgh, told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. “One of the requirements of the Act is to be able to log audio levels to prove compliance. As this requirement did not exist previously, most stations were required to purchase additional equipment to comply with that aspect of the rules.”

The cost, which he estimated in the “thousands of dollars, but not in the tens of thousands of dollars,” was “reasonable money spent for a reasonable effort.” The upgrades allow stations to log audio levels, proving compliance.

The CALM Act gives stations and providers a bit of flexibility in handling loudness complaints. According to the new standards (based on the ATSC A/85 specification),phone call or e-mail isn’t enough to warrant an FCC investigation, although patterns of them will demand review. Failure to meet these new modulation standards could result in fines.

A year ago, the FCC passed regulations requiring broadcasters and cable and satellite TV systems to maintain constant volume levels. A Harris poll taken around that time found that 86 percent of people surveyed said TV commercials were louder than the shows themselves — and, in many cases, much louder.

Normal listening levels average about 70 decibels for a typical TV broadcast. The level ranges from 60 decibels for a restaurant conversation to 80 decibels for a garbage disposal. However, levels on a TV channel could vary by as much as 20 decibels.

The FCC is soliciting viewer auditing during the transition. To report loud commercials, call 1-888-225-5322 with information such as time and date of the commercial, description of the ad, plus station or network. Information also can be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, Consumer & Government Complaints Division, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554.

“You can debate all day about whether the industry actually needed a federal law to control how loud programs are,” said Ken Hunold, a staff engineer at Dolby Labs, “but it certainly has raised awareness of loudness across multiple industries. And at the end of the day, bringing people together for a common cause is always a good thing.”

Discuss this Article 11

This one goes to 11 (not verified)
on Dec 13, 2012

Complete waste of time for the government to get involved. Sure some commercials may have been too loud, but the issue is more related to relative loudness. If your watching a drama, and the final scene is a quite conversation between two actors, then you jump to commercial, it's going to seem very loud. I'd love to see the first few investigations where the logging shows that the program audio was at like 40 db and then the commercial was at a higher, but legal level.

Matthew Lewis (not verified)
on Dec 13, 2012

Yes and GREAT username by the way! LOL. I think a big problem could lie in some of the smaller low-power stations who broadcast shows often at a greatly reduced volume level overall or perhaps old shows from the black and white/mono (non-stereo) era that have an ambient "hiss" requiring the viewer to turn up the volume in an attempt to "drown out" the hiss or simply to have the audio to a level of clarity to the human ear. Then suddenly you have a seemingly LOUD commercial that's actually in compliance with the law but appears to be 10x the level of the show. I'm a musician, but I admittedly know little about audio effects but it seems this could all be simply cured by the usage of either a compressor or an effect called an audio leveler or clipper. They're both available on my multi-effects-processor for my electric guitar and work seemingly well. The whole blasted effects unit (with about 100 other effects additionally) only cost about $200 so I don't see it being a very expensive addition, even if one purchased the "top of the line" model. This simply takes audio that is at a lower level and brings it up to wherever you set it as well as reducing louder audio and lowering it to that level. You may lose some of the dramatic effects and get weird "conversation level" whispering but I think that's a plus too. How often (especially in movies) do we find ourselves turning up the volume to hear what is said in a dramatic scene only to be blown out of the room by the resulting dialogue or soundtrack?!

JDL (not verified)
on Dec 13, 2012

One of the issues that must be addressed by many local stations is that their local program audio levels are in compliance and match their incoming network program levels, as well as the commercial levels.

RDC (not verified)
on Dec 13, 2012

Anyone with any knowledge knows that the primary culprit in this is local cable insertion. With dozens of networks/channels being inserted into, historically they have had less quality control than a broadcaster with just one or two channels. Wait 'til the the lawsuits and court cases start on this one. What a complete and total waste of time, money and resources.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Dec 13, 2012

I've been in television for years. This is the first time audio levels have even been considered. It's been a very bad problem for many years. The recent problem has simply been because there was never a standard volume meter, it was the VU which was reasonable, then when audio went digital the new digital dbfs meters were and are useless! not one video editing system to date has a useable loudness meter on it! It is no wonder things went out of control. At lest people are taking audio levels seriously for once, unfortunately, the ham handed way most auto level controls deal with the issue the quality of the audio has been reduced. win some lose some...

WillM (not verified)
on Dec 14, 2012

It is complete BS to have audio levels regulated by the FCC. Perception of audio levels is VERY subjective. Look at the loudness wars that have been progressing with CD audio. There is no way to go above 0db, but when you compress the hell out of a track the PERCEIVED volume level can be much louder than a track that's not compressed as much, while both are still hitting peak levels.

This should have been a matter of innovation, not regulation. Allow the TV industry to innovate by touting audio limiting as a feature. If consumers want it, they will have the choice to do so.

To regulate broadcasters in this manner in the United States is completely ridiculous. I hope the first fine gets challenged in court under the First Amendment.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Dec 17, 2012

Channel 12 KSAT too loud at 5:10 pm (and at other times before and after that time listed) as far as commercials are concerned! I think there may be a loophole in the law!?! I am not stupid nor are other people in San Antonio, Texas!

Anonymous (not verified)
on Dec 17, 2012

5:23 pm it continues on sat 12 news in San Antonio!

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jan 13, 2013

it still is loud here in Dallas

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 23, 2013

The government is not enforcing the calm act.

Anonymous (not verified)
on May 15, 2013

is there any Lawyer that would take my action lawsuit for the many years I have been subjected to loud advertisements loud and illegal

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Broadcast Engineering ID
(optional)

Ads by Google

Watch Broadcast Engineering at NAB

Read the NAB blog for the latest show news

Why Go Digital

Newsletter Block - Editable

Subscribe to our newsletters and get regular updates on the technology that most interests you.

Download Smart Playout Center