Calhoun Satellite Communications adopts 10-bit compression

Calhoun Satellite Communications has added ATEME 10-bit encoders and decoders.
Calhoun Satellite Communications has added ATEME MPEG-2 and H.264 4:2:2 10-bit contribution encoders and decoders to its satellite truck fleet.

Mobile satellite uplink service provider Calhoun Satellite Communications has announced it has upgraded its multiplatform DSNG fleet with ATEME’s MPEG-2 and H.264 4:2:2 10-bit contribution encoders and decoders. 

Beginning in early 2012, Calhoun covered several professional football, basketball, motor racing and national news events using ATEME’s Kyrion CM4101 encoder and DR8400 H.264 HD 10-bit 4:2:2 integrated receiver decoder (IRD), both of which also support MPEG-2 operation for legacy mobile uplink requirements.

“Calhoun Satellite is proud to be the first mobile uplink operator with a Dual Dish C/Ku Band vehicle on the road, and now a 10-bit codec on board” said Calhoun Satellite Communications owner David Fruitman

Today, Calhoun's inventory includes two dual-dish C-/Ku-band trucks, three Ku-band trucks, one C-band and one Ku-band trailer. Calhoun's trucks are based in locations between Miami and Pittsburgh to provide easy access to a wide geographic area throughout North America.

Discuss this Article 1

Tom Lewis
on Nov 7, 2012

I find this intriguing, and I may not have the best understanding here but doesn't content from remote trucks usually not see significant generational editing or other manipulation before as it is passed through to viewers (which, to my understanding, if were needed would be the only real advantage of using higher sampling or more detailed color space)?

Since SMPTE310 is impressed on that product eventually, and that is 8-bit 4:2:0, what would be the advantage of transporting it as 10-bit 4:2:2? 10-bit words would be eventually truncated to 8-bit, and the extra sub-sampling of chroma would be lost as well.

Is it that the conversion for P2Air would be less destructive, and if so, why? And of course if the content were delivered as 8-bit 4:2:0 MPEG2 in the first place there would probably be no need for significant or destructive conversion.

Otherwise this seems like a case of empty bragging rights with no real advantage being leveraged as an attempt to create a false perception of significant value where none really may exist.

I'm not saying there might not be real value here, I just fail to see where that lies.

Those who might be able to clear this up for me please chime in. Is my cynicism unwarranted?

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Broadcast Engineering ID
(optional)

Ads by Google

Watch Broadcast Engineering at NAB

Read the NAB blog for the latest show news

Why Go Digital

Newsletter Block - Editable

Subscribe to our newsletters and get regular updates on the technology that most interests you.

Download Smart Playout Center