Computer architectures

Aug 1, 2008 12:00 PM, By Brad Gilmer

Take steps to secure your network from attack.

             

Frequently, I have talked in this column about separating the broadcast core computer networks from business networks and the Internet. In the real world, things are not so clear-cut; there are many different network segments, all needing differing levels of connectivity and security.

Your facility probably consists of a number of networks, including a:

  • secure network for broadcast operations (automation, etc.);

  • traffic network for the traffic department;

  • production network for post production, graphics and so on;

  • news system network;

  • business network (billing, sales, traffic, employee e-mail, etc.);

  • demilitarized zone (DMZ) for Web hosting and streaming;

  • virtual private network (VPN) for connecting remote studios and facilities;

  • VPN for remote access from employees' homes, etc.;

  • wireless network for in-house employees;

  • wireless network for visitors; and

  • an Internet network.

Let's assume that you have analyzed your facility and come up with the list above. The next step is to think about the connectivity required between the networks and the level of security for these networks. You might create a table similar to Table 1. (See page 30.) While you may disagree with the classifications in Table 1, the point is that different networks require a variety of security and access, and that the architectures behind these networks are determined by the clients' requirements for access to data across the network.

There are a couple of interesting things to point out in this table. Note that the traffic network and the VPN for remote access by employees both have demanding networking requirements. Clients require a high degree of connectivity to other networks. They need broad access to office applications, but they also have a high need for security.

Figure 1. This diagram shows the high-level architectural design of a typical broadcast facility. Note that this architecture takes advantage of several different layers of security, while providing a high degree of connectivity within related departments.

Figure 1. This diagram shows the high-level architectural design of a typical broadcast facility. Note that this architecture takes advantage of several different layers of security, while providing a high degree of connectivity within related departments.

These are challenging scenarios where security should be of considerable concern. The VPN requirement for security is clearly understood. But it may be less obvious that high security is required in the traffic department. Clients in these systems typically touch not only the business networks and the Internet, but also the highly sensitive broadcast network. Special care should be taken to ensure that the security of the broadcast network is not invalidated by problems with traffic clients. The same may be said of news systems because they demand a lot of connectivity to the outside world, but the information from these systems must also get to the broadcast core.

Figure 1 shows a high-level architecture that could be used to connect the various networks described in Table 1. The figure includes different network zones, or areas of security and access, such as Internet and DMZ, business/news/traffic, production/facilities, and broadcast core.

The networks on the left of the diagram have broad connectivity. The networks on the right are more secure. Starting at the left of the diagram is the wide area network (WAN) router. This device connects the facility to the Internet. It also allows us to establish a DMZ for publicly accessible equipment such as Web servers, streaming servers and visitor wireless connections. Note that this is a simplified diagram. There are firewall components in the WAN router, but they are not shown here. There are also security components in the Web and streaming servers. Security is present, but it is not as tight as it is further into the network. The router/firewall connected to local area network (LAN) side of the WAN router isolates the main facility from the Internet and from people using visitor wireless services.

Business/news/traffic network

In the business/news/traffic network zone, I have grouped networks with similar levels of connectivity and need for Internet access. Also, generally speaking, these areas have similar security requirements. That said, there is a lot going on in this system that isn't shown. The news and traffic systems both require connections to the broadcast core. This is done by configuring access control lists (ACLs) in the router/firewalls of the system. Also, the news or traffic system may have components that connect to the networks at various places.

Think carefully about how these connections are made. You can use as simple or complex an approach as you like, but increasing connectivity without increasing the complexity/security of the network can lead to security issues.

Production/facilities

Production/facilities are the next layer of the network. As the diagram shows, this zone is more secure, and as with the last network, the clients on these networks are grouped by similar access and security needs. The production network has to be secure; however, people in post facilities still need access to other areas of the facility and the broadcast core. In some facilities, a VPN is used to connect two or more production facilities on a semi-permanent basis. This allows users in two facilities to exchange content as they work together on a project.

Broadcast core

Finally, the innermost network is the broadcast core. This core network is protected by a series of firewalls and routers that severely restrict access. Once again, ACLs and other security mechanisms play a critical role in protecting this network. It is important to protect the core facility from the malicious actions of people on the Internet or within your facility. That said, in all the time I have been working in the industry, I have never heard of someone hacking into an automation system or other on-air system from the Internet or from the business side of a network.

On the other hand, I have personally tracked down and fixed three failed computer systems that crashed in such a way as to render the network unusable for everyone. In all cases, these were hardware failures, and in all cases (fortunately), the broadcast core was insulated from the failure by routers, which prevented the garbage transmitted by these failed computers from reaching critical systems.


Brad Gilmer is president of Gilmer & Associates, executive director of the Advanced Media Workflow Association and executive director of the Video Services Forum.

Table 1. When analyzing the architecture of your broadcast facility, a table such as this one helps you think about the architecture, security and access required by the clients on the networks.
Network Connectivity Security level Access to office applications
Broadcast operations Low Very high Very low
Traffic Medium High High
Production Medium High Medium
News High Medium High
Business High Medium High
DMZ High Low None
VPN for facilities Low Very high High
VPN for remote access High Very high High
Wireless in-house High High High
Wireless visitors Low Low Low
Internet Low Low Low

Send questions and comments to: brad.gilmer@penton.com




Want to use this article?
Click here for options!
Get Copyright Clearance

Share this article

blog comments powered by Disqus

 


Current Issue

A view from the top

January 2012

Some of broadcast's brightest reveal where the industry is headed.

Read More articles...

Related Newsletter

Transition to Digital
A twice per month tutorial on digital technology.

Related Posts


Confused about the terminology in an article? Find definitions of common terms and abbreviations in Broadcast Engineering's Glossary.

 


Submit your product for our NAB coverage.

Resources

Broadcast Engineering Newsletters Broadcast Engineering Essential Guides Broadcast Engineering White Papers Broadcast Engineering Videos Broadcast Engineering Podcasts Broadcast Engineering Industry Calendar

Industry Calendar

Broadcast Engineering Glossary of Terms

Glossary

Broadcast Engineering RSS feed

RSS

Interactive Media

Broadcast Engineering Webinars Broadcast Engineering Training Broadcast Engineering Blogs Broadcast Engineering Mobile Apps Broadcast Engineering on Facebook

Facebook

Broadcast Engineering JobZone

JobZone

Broadcast Engineering BE Roll

Blog

Featured Products

A Broadcaster's Guide To Camera & Lens Technology

A Broadcaster's Guide To Camera & Lens TechnologyThis eBook provides both new and veteran shooters an in-depth understanding of the technology that lies between the camera lens and the recording medium and how to maximize a camera's performance.

File Based Technology and Workflow

File Based Technology and WorkflowFile-based technologies have replaced video tape methods for a majority of production and broadcast operations. The worlds of AV and IT are coalescing to create new methods and workflows for media

Digital Television Fundamentals

Digital Television FundamentalsThis course, written by broadcast engineer Phil Cianci, provides a basic tutorial platform on the hows and whys of ATSC digital operation.

Video Compression, Editing and Displays

Video Compression, Editing and DisplaysVideo compression, editing and displays is an in-depth tutorial on MPEG compression technology, editing MPEG content and evaluating color video monitors written by long-time video expert, trainer and writer Steve Mullen, Ph. D.

 

 

Sound Off Podcasts

Erik Moreno, co-general manager of the Mobile Content Venture

MCV racks up successes on way to bright mobile DTV future

2012 will be the year of mobile DTV. That’s the view of Erik Moreno, who along with Salil Dalvi, senior VP for Mobile Platform Development at NBC Universal, is co-general manager of the Mobile Content Venture.

Danny Wilson

OTT year in review

Hear snippets of podcast interviews done throughout 2011 with Pat McDonough of The Nielsen Company, Glen Friedman of Ideas & Solutions!, Danny Wilson of Pixelmetrix and Greg Herman of Watch TV. Pictured is Danny Wilson, Pixelmetrix.

 

Broadcast Engineering Digital Reference Guide

Browse Back Issues

Back to Top