Cure for concatenation

Mar 1, 2009 12:00 PM

Use precision filter technology to preserve 4:2:0 chroma integrity in concatenated operations.

             

Precision filter technology

One solution now available uses a precise set of filters that process the 4:2:2 chroma component and downsamples it with a low-pass filter and 2:1 vertical sampler to create a 4:2:0 output. At the receive end, the 4:2:0 chroma component is accurately upsampled to recreate a 4:2:2 signal, as shown in Figure 4, that can be passed to the next concatenated link over an HD/SD-SDI interconnect.

This process allows an encoded 4:2:0 stream to be carried efficiently over any digital communications link.

Figure 5. 4:2:2 downsampling/4:2:0 upsampling process

Figure 5. 4:2:2 downsampling/4:2:0 upsampling process
Click to enlarge

To maintain non-degraded 4:2:0 chroma resolution throughout the concatenated chain, it is necessary for all encoders and decoders in the transmission link to use identical filter sets. However, the 4:2:0 stream may be decoded with degradation, but without undue errors or color displacement by decoders not fitted with the precision filter technology. (See Figure 5.)

The precision filter technology has been proven in tests demonstrating its ability to protect the integrity of the 4:2:0 chroma component in up to 16 concatenated encode and decode operations. Now, let's examine the protection that such precision filter design provides.

In a series of tests, a comparison between the original chroma PSNR was made with that at the output of the second, fourth, eighth and 16th concatenation of the 4:2:2/4:2:0 conversions. Test results shown in Figure 6 demonstrate chroma degradation in conventional concatenated operations and the level of protection provided by the non-degraded 4:2:0 precise filter solution that maintained PSNR close to that of the original 4:2:2 source.

Figure 6. Chroma PSNR of conventional and non-degraded technology

Figure 6. Chroma PSNR of conventional and non-degraded technology
Click to enlarge

It is generally recognized that downsampling and upsampling is more difficult for interlace than for progressive video largely because of nonlinear phase characteristics. The generation of unwanted artifacts is also more pervasive. Even so, the precise filtering discussed here properly handles both video formats.

It appears that such a solution can enable longer-distance encoded video communications links with less degradation. As such, many of the problems of multiple concatenations could become a thing of the past.

Author's note: The original research and material of Akira Nakagawa of Fujitsu Laboratories contributed to this article.


Keith Dunford is currently a consultant for the video solutions group of Fujitsu Computer Products of America as well as managing partner of The Exam Group.




Want to use this article?
Click here for options!
Get Copyright Clearance

Share this article

blog comments powered by Disqus

 


Current Issue

A view from the top

January 2012

Some of broadcast's brightest reveal where the industry is headed.

Read More articles...

Related Newsletter

Transition to Digital
A twice per month tutorial on digital technology.

Confused about the terminology in an article? Find definitions of common terms and abbreviations in Broadcast Engineering's Glossary.

 


Submit your product for our NAB coverage.

Resources

Broadcast Engineering Newsletters Broadcast Engineering Essential Guides Broadcast Engineering White Papers Broadcast Engineering Videos Broadcast Engineering Podcasts Broadcast Engineering Industry Calendar

Industry Calendar

Broadcast Engineering Glossary of Terms

Glossary

Broadcast Engineering RSS feed

RSS

Interactive Media

Broadcast Engineering Webinars Broadcast Engineering Training Broadcast Engineering Blogs Broadcast Engineering Mobile Apps Broadcast Engineering on Facebook

Facebook

Broadcast Engineering JobZone

JobZone

Broadcast Engineering BE Roll

Blog

Featured Products

A Broadcaster's Guide To Camera & Lens Technology

A Broadcaster's Guide To Camera & Lens TechnologyThis eBook provides both new and veteran shooters an in-depth understanding of the technology that lies between the camera lens and the recording medium and how to maximize a camera's performance.

File Based Technology and Workflow

File Based Technology and WorkflowFile-based technologies have replaced video tape methods for a majority of production and broadcast operations. The worlds of AV and IT are coalescing to create new methods and workflows for media

Digital Television Fundamentals

Digital Television FundamentalsThis course, written by broadcast engineer Phil Cianci, provides a basic tutorial platform on the hows and whys of ATSC digital operation.

Video Compression, Editing and Displays

Video Compression, Editing and DisplaysVideo compression, editing and displays is an in-depth tutorial on MPEG compression technology, editing MPEG content and evaluating color video monitors written by long-time video expert, trainer and writer Steve Mullen, Ph. D.

 

 

Sound Off Podcasts

Erik Moreno, co-general manager of the Mobile Content Venture

MCV racks up successes on way to bright mobile DTV future

2012 will be the year of mobile DTV. That’s the view of Erik Moreno, who along with Salil Dalvi, senior VP for Mobile Platform Development at NBC Universal, is co-general manager of the Mobile Content Venture.

Danny Wilson

OTT year in review

Hear snippets of podcast interviews done throughout 2011 with Pat McDonough of The Nielsen Company, Glen Friedman of Ideas & Solutions!, Danny Wilson of Pixelmetrix and Greg Herman of Watch TV. Pictured is Danny Wilson, Pixelmetrix.

 

Broadcast Engineering Digital Reference Guide

Browse Back Issues

Back to Top