IOT cooling contamination
Feb 1, 2009 8:27 AM, By Russell Brown
Advances in inductive output tube design have allowed IOTs to continue to operate up to and beyond 80,000 hours. Although some IOTs fail much sooner for a variety of reasons, most will live a long life when properly cared for. Defects in the internal structure of the tube have become rarer these days, but that’s not the only thing that can cause a tube failure. Improperly maintained voltages can shorten an IOT’s life span, so can inadequate high-voltage protection and contaminates in the cooling system. When not properly maintained, a dirty cooling system can kill a perfectly good IOT and throw the capital budget out of whack. This type of failure does happen from contaminates in the cooling liquid, which in most cases means glycol.
Liquid cooling
Glycol, basically an alcohol-based heat-transfer fluid, is the liquid often used today in cooling IOT transmitters. Several main suppliers provide both ethylene and propylene glycol, but two of the more commonly used glycols are Ucartherm and Dowtherm SR-1, both from Dow Chemical. Besides transferring heat, they also perform another very important function: inhibiting corrosion of the pipes internal and external to the tube. Another important feature is their ability to prevent pipes from bursting when freezing weather sets in, which can cause quite a problem because the easiest place for those pipes to burst is in the radiators, requiring the entire radiator to be changed.
Figure 2
Click to enlarge
But once the transmitter has been installed and it’s running, there can be a tendency to forget about the transmitter’s coolant. Just like an automobile, its fluids need periodic checking. About once a year, the transmitter’s cooling fluid should be tested. In the past, some engineers would just check the specific gravity of the cooling fluid and top it off with more glycol if it was low. Today, an entire battery of tests can be performed on a transmitter’s coolant to give a much better idea of what is going on inside a cooling system. Most suppliers will do the testing for a fee. (It used to be free if you bought their product, but they do at least give you a comprehensive report.)
As you can see, in Figure 1 (pdf), the concentration of glycol is OK and the corrosion inhibitors are within limits. This report even gives recommendations on what action, if any, should be taken.
If any of the parameters are not within the stated limits, this particular report would advise adding certain compounds to correct this. But most transmitter and tube manufacturers will now advise you to replace the cooling fluid instead, which is easier said than done. The reason for this is cost: The few hundred dollars it costs to replace the glycol is small compared to the cost of a tube if it fails due to the breakdown of the coolant, and no one wants to take that responsibility.
Figure 3
Click to enlarge
With today’s environmental regulations and laws, it’s much harder and costly to dispose of transmitter cooling fluid than in the past. Back then, you could just open a valve and let it run down the drain; today, that would be very irresponsible and is illegal. Even when the transmitter site is far off on a mountain top, just letting it run out on the ground can injure or kill wildlife.
In California, you need to obtain a temporary EPA license and then arrange with a disposal company to come take the glycol away in 55g drums.
Don’t forget to check and clean the heat exchange radiators — look underneath and remove any leaves or other debris that has been sucked up by the fans. It’s also recommended that the thermostats for the fans be adjusted, so every year the first fan to turn on (which is the one running most of the time) will be rotated. This is a notable point, because over the years that last fan may be needed, and you won’t know if it works if it never turns on under normal conditions. (See Figure 2, above.)
The same holds true for the water pumps. They should be rotated at least every couple of months or, even better, at the monthly log readings. This way, it’s easy to see if one pump has failed before it’s needed.
| Want to use this article? Click here for options! |  |
